Opinion: School Closures Were Very Bad Policy

By John Hood

RALEIGH — Roughly everyone in the United States — with the possible exception of teacher-union leaders and their pet politicians — knew that learning losses from COVID-era school shutdowns were going to be big. But the latest results from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) still retained their power to shock.

From 2020 to 2022, average scale scores for American nine-year-olds dropped by five points in reading and seven points in math. That’s the largest decline in reading scores since 1990. It’s the first-ever decline in math scores. As might be expected, learning losses were largest among students who were already low-performing and among disadvantaged students with less access to parental support and resources while trying to learn at home.

Here in North Carolina, 51% of our public-school students scored at “grade-level proficiency” on state exams in 2022, up from a disastrous 45% in 2021 but still well below the 59% levels of 2017, 2018, and 2019. North Carolina also sets a higher bar, called “college and career ready,” for which the latest averages are even more sobering: 34% in 2022, compared with 30% in 2021 and 45% in 2019.

When the pandemic struck in early 2020, I wrote many times about the difficult tradeoffs our policymakers faced. Although I didn’t always agree with the choices they made, I understood the reasoning behind the initial shutdowns and subsequent restrictions on commerce and travel. Presented with limited information, few therapeutic options, and no vaccines for this deadly disease, policymakers’ options were constrained and inherently costly.

Early in the pandemic, however, it became clear that the disease’s risk profile was greatly skewed by age and preexisting conditions such as obesity. Young children faced (and still face) a tiny risk of serious illness from COVID-19. Other countries started reopening their public schools in the summer of 2020, as did some states. North Carolina didn’t. As some of us argued at the time, and as most in retrospect now concede, this was a very bad call.

Defenders of Gov. Roy Cooper and his administration would hasten to point out that North Carolina has experienced a relatively low rate of COVID-19 deaths. Doesn’t that prove that the state’s approach to school reopening, and to pandemic restrictions more generally, was the right one?

Not so fast. While North Carolina’s COVID mortality compares favorably to that of neighboring states, the story is more complicated than that. For one thing, because the risk of serious illness is so strongly related to demographics, simply eyeballing raw totals is unwise. You have to adjust the data.

The most recent age-adjusted death rates I’ve seen were produced in late August by the Bioinformatics CRO, an international research team. Its figure for North Carolina is 295 per 100,000 residents, ranking the state 29th in the nation. That’s clearly better than the age-adjusted death rates of Tennessee (403), Georgia (359), and South Carolina (356). But North Carolina’s rate is actually a little higher than Florida’s rate of 288 per 100,000.

Remember the furious criticism hurled at Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis for restricting his state’s businesses too little and reopening his schools too early? As it turned out, the Sunshine State’s risk-adjusted COVID deaths aren’t much different from those of, say, Illinois and Connecticut — and are significantly better than those of tightly controlled Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

Indeed, according to a separate statistical analysis by the Bioinformatics CRO, the stringency of state lockdown measures — including school closures, workplace closures, and restrictions on public gatherings — shows no correlation with COVID deaths after adjusting for each state’s age and obesity rates.

We can’t yet know for certain whether states that opened their schools early, such as Florida, experienced significantly less learning loss than North Carolina did. The NAEP reading and math trends I referenced earlier are not yet available at the state level, and it’s best to use a common yardstick for such measurements.

But I’d say it’s a reasonable guess. Lengthy school closures were, in fact, unreasonable.

John Hood is a John Locke Foundation board member. His latest books, Mountain Folk and Forest Folk, combine epic fantasy with early American history (FolkloreCycle.com).


    • Umm, there is no evidence closing school saved one life. In fact, a recent study by Johns Hopkins stated lockdowns did little to prevent the spread of Covid. Furthermore, even the most unlearned individual knows the only thing that stops a virus is the human immune system. The virus was and is , never going away. It will always be here. The only thing masks and lockdowns did was prolong how long people suffered. Almost all deaths had at least 2 comorbidities, this from the cdc. The fact is on average 40,000 people die each year of the regular flu. Yes, there are people who are more susceptible to severe consequence and those people should be careful in large groups. Shutting school will have lasting consequences for years. Typical knee jerk reaction…or could the hysteria and lockdowns have been a rationale for other purposes? Hmmmm

        • I got my information from Johns Hopkins. Pretty sure they know a little bit more than a reporter who, if you research the author, is completely bias. You believe the news and I’ll believe doctors, that’s your right and I respect everyone’s right. Science deniers are hard to convince so I won’t try to convince you that you are wrong.

          • @RussellZiskey: If you’re basing m dical decisions on an unpublished, unreviewed paper written by an economist, we’ll … That’s all I need to know. Good luck!

  1. “Presented with limited information, few therapeutic options, and no vaccines for this deadly disease, policymakers’ options were constrained and inherently costly.”

    This is a false statement as HCQ and IVM were available and very effective at reducing mortality and long term complications of Covid. As well, vitamin D and zinc were shown to be very effective early on at preventing and reducing symptoms of Covid. Censorship and corrupt government officials kept these very safe drugs from the public resulting in more deaths, longer closures and more unnecessary tyranny. IVM is now a recommended treatment for Covid per the CDCs website. The vaccine is not needed as successful treatments were and still are available but if these drugs were allowed to be used the pharmas would not be able to apply for an EUA. Operation warp speed is the biggest mistake of Trumps presidency causing continued death and disability every day.




  2. Forget the Covid angle. The real story here (that is deftly obfuscated in this opinion piece) is that only 59% public-school students scored at “grade-level proficiency” on state exams *BEFORE COVID*.

    This shows that NC’s public schools are a failure — even without Covid problems.

    If someone looks at this data and still believes that a free, publicly funded education is efficient and effective, then you’re obviously more concerned with promoting government spending and teacher unions — not actually educating children.

  3. If course it was. There was never any danger to children. But that is the tip of the iceberg. Those poor children whose parents who were complicit in giving their own children the worthless and sometimes deadly “vaccine” willing or even enthusiastically… well can only conclude they really didn’t like their own children. Anyway, I hope they are all going to be ok as they had no choice in the matter. Luckily it was only a very small percentage of kids whose parents hated their own offspring.

      • Totally different type of vaccine. It was not an mRNA vaccine. Look up who developed this type and see what he says about the Covid one.

Comments are closed.