By Mike Walden
Decades from now, people who lived through the pandemic will remember it as a horrible period. Over a million people in our country died, with millions more sick but still surviving. Thousands of businesses closed forever, learning was lost in schools, and lives were disrupted in multiple ways.
But could there be some positive impacts of the pandemic? Some say the new technologies for remote interactions in business, medicine and shopping have been a plus. The pandemic revealed dependencies we’ve developed on other countries for key products. This has sparked renewed interest in “re-shoring” some of those products to our country, which would both increase our economic independence and create jobs.
One of the most significant economic issues of our time has been widening income inequality. This simply means the income gap between those with higher incomes and those with lower incomes has been growing.
A big reason for this trend is economic changes in the 21st century. Technology has been the driver of much of the recent economy. Firms in the tech sector need highly trained workers, often with four-year college degrees or more. These trends have led to big pay increases for college-degreed workers in technology and also in many other professional occupations. The pay raises for college-trained workers have swamped those for other workers, thereby leading to larger gaps between high-paid workers and low-paid workers.
However, some recent national statistics indicate this situation may have changed. In the last two years, national numbers show hourly earnings have risen fastest for occupations paying the least while at the same time increasing the slowest for occupations paying the most. This has resulted in income inequality decreasing during the last two years.
Don’t misinterpret this statement. Workers in high-earning occupations still make more money than workers in low-earning occupations. Yet, compared to two years ago, the gap in earnings is lower today.
What’s happened to cause this outcome? Has our economic world been turned upside down? No, it’s not been turned upside down, but it may have been twisted.
Two forces have collided to reduce income inequality. The first is the pandemic. The pandemic made many people cautious about taking jobs that often require personal contact, particularly if the job is low-paying. Indeed, studies are now revealing a significant number of workers furloughed from their low-paying jobs during the pandemic used their free time to upgrade their skills. Consequently, when the economy reopened, those individuals moved to higher-paying occupations.
The second force is demographics. Many — but certainly not all — low-paying jobs are taken by young workers. The jobs I had while in high school and college were certainly low-paying. But due to a declining birth rate, the increase in younger workers has significantly slowed. This has limited the potential availability — in economics, we call it “supply” — of low-wage workers.
Hence, with relatively fewer workers seeking their jobs, firms in low-paying businesses have needed to increase hourly earnings to compete for employees.
The narrowing of income inequality has happened at the national level, but what about North Carolina? I have tracked trends in income inequality in North Carolina over several decades. I recently updated my measures to include data since the pandemic.
The answer to my question about whether income inequality has narrowed in our state is “yes” — indeed, a big “yes.” I divided North Carolina occupations into three categories: high-paying, middle-paying and low-paying. High-paying occupations include jobs in sectors like finance, management and the professions. Middle-paying occupations are in manufacturing, construction, health care, education and a few others. Low-paying occupations include administrative support, personal services and food service, plus a few more.
For most of the last two decades, income inequality in North Carolina has increased, just as in the nation. But since the pandemic, there’s been a dramatic change. From 2020 to mid-2022, average weekly earnings for high-paying occupations rose 2.7%. For middle-paying occupations, the jump was 7.2%. But for low-paying occupations, the gain in average weekly earnings was 15.3%, twice the increase for middle-paying occupations and more than 5½ times the increase for high-paying occupations.
Combined with other measures I developed, income inequality in North Carolina in mid-2022 was at the lowest level in two decades.
Of course, low-paying businesses that were induced to raise worker wages by over 15% in less than two years likely had to raise their prices significantly to customers. But this would also happen if the pay jump was for high-paying or middle-paying occupations.
One question is whether workers in low-paying occupations will continue to see similar gains, or even if they will keep their current gains. Much will depend on how businesses with low-paying occupations adjust to these new circumstances in future years. Will they use more technology and consequently reduce the employment of people? Or could they reorganize tasks to use fewer workers but continue to pay them more?
The recent news on income inequality in the country and North Carolina is good. Will the trends continue, or will they be temporary? You decide.
Walden is a William Neal Reynolds Distinguished Professor Emeritus at North Carolina State University. The full income inequality report is available here.
Since 2020, the richest 1% of people have accumulated close to two-thirds of all new wealth created around the world.
Full report by Oxfam: https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/richest-1-bag-nearly-twice-much-wealth-rest-world-put-together-over-past-two-years
And what does that have to do with you or me?
Don’t covet. It’s a sin.
Just stating facts as to what has occurred that has increased the wealth gap worldwide. The results of this gap may prove to be quite troublesome.
That money has to come from somewhere, and it’s us either way. Either we choose to do business with those companies (voluntary), or our governments give them money (involuntary). Either way, if we truly have a government by the people, then we either must choose NOT to do business with large corporations, or elect people who will not capitulate with them. It’s ironic, because the Uniparty in Washington LOVES bolstering government coffers in order to have large amounts of money they shovel to all sorts of entities. Where does the welfare money (think SNAP, WIC, and TANF) go? Large grocery chains and home goods suppliers. If you look at the FEC donations, it’s clearly evident where these company CEOs are supporting government expansion, increased inflation (think resource holders versus cash holders). The poor get the food (barely) and the rich get the money; but PLEASE tell me how we need MORE of this. I’m all ears.
Yup the scamdemic caused the rich to get richer on the backs of the poor who got poorer all in the name of public health for a cold! And now the big lie about the clot shot is killing and disabling people making the gap even worse.
Lower wages may be increasing but the cost of living is taking the increase.So how is it any better.A dollar burger at a major fast food business is now 3 dollars.
I have found income “inequality” is directly proportional to work ethic. It’s a typical dog whistle word that has no meaning and is more of a political tool than any meaningful definition. My income is less than the income of the ceo of blue cross blue shield is that “income inequality”? Give me a break.