Johnston County Telework Records Raise Questions About Who Is Really Working From Home
Johnston County Had No Central Count Of Teleworkers Until JoCoReport Asked
SMITHFIELD, N.C. – Johnston County Commission Chairman Patrick Harris says the County Manager should have a clear understanding of who is authorized to telework and under what circumstances — an accounting Johnston County government did not have readily available until JoCoReport began asking questions.

The county spent approximately three months compiling records showing 188 full-time employees are authorized for scheduled telework, representing about 13.2 percent of Johnston County’s 1,423 full-time workforce.
JoCoReport began examining the county’s work-from-home program after receiving tips from Johnston County employees who raised concerns about access to supervisors while some department directors were working remotely.
County employees identified three department heads they said sometimes telework.
None of the three appeared on the county’s list of employees approved for telework.
The employees did not say the department heads work remotely every day, and JoCoReport has not independently confirmed how often the three work away from their county offices.
Their absence from the county’s telework list, however, raises questions about whether the newly compiled count includes everyone who works remotely — even occasionally — and how those arrangements are being tracked.
JoCoReport submitted its public records request May 19 seeking the names and titles of employees authorized to work remotely, departments allowing telework, copies of policies and agreements, approval dates and whether arrangements were full-time or hybrid.
The information was provided approximately three months later.
County Manager Should Know, Chairman Says
Harris said telework has largely been managed at the department level.
“Department heads are responsible for managing their employees’ schedules and determining who is authorized to telework and when,” Harris said.
But he also said responsibility does not end there.
“At the same time, I believe the County Manager should have a clear understanding of who is authorized to telework and under what circumstances.”
Before JoCoReport’s inquiry, the county did not have the 188-employee figure readily compiled in a centralized accounting.
That is notable because Johnston County’s written policy calls for formal review and approval of telework arrangements.
The policy says the position must be suitable for remote work, public and internal service cannot be disrupted, and supervisors must be able to adequately evaluate an employee’s performance.
The policy also calls for telework agreements to move through department and Human Resources review, with approval involving county management.
Three Department Heads Not On List
The reports involving department heads raise a separate concern.
Department directors supervise employees, oversee daily operations and have a role in determining which employees under them may telework.
County employees who contacted JoCoReport questioned how accessible department heads are to staff and the public when those managers are working remotely.
Again, employees said the three directors sometimes telework — not that working remotely is their normal or daily schedule.
Still, none of the three names appeared among the employees Johnston County identified as approved for telework.
That leaves unanswered whether those department heads are working remotely under another type of arrangement, whether their names were inadvertently omitted, or whether the county’s list is incomplete.
Harris said he believes department heads can effectively lead while working remotely.
“I have every confidence that department heads can effectively manage their operations and supervise employees when working remotely under a telework arrangement,” Harris said.
“Today’s technology makes remote communication easy, whether by video conferencing, chat, text or phone.”
He said employees working remotely should be held to the same expectations as those physically reporting to county offices.
“Employees working remotely are expected to meet the same standards as employees working in the office — to work their scheduled hours, be responsive and complete their assigned work,” Harris said.
“If an employee does not meet those expectations, telework authorization is revoked and the employee must return to working in the office.”
The county has not provided JoCoReport with figures showing how many employees have had telework privileges revoked or how frequently existing telework arrangements are reviewed.
Who Teleworks?
Telework is concentrated in a relatively small number of county departments.
Departments reporting employees authorized for telework include:
- Child Support Enforcement
- County Attorney – DSS Legal
- Emergency Services
- Finance
- GIS
- Health Department
- Human Resources
- Internal Audit
- Social Services
- Tax Administration
- Technology
County records identify employees approved for telework throughout those departments.
Social Services and Health account for most of the county’s reported teleworkers.
114 of the 188 employees are in Social Services and another 39 are in the Health Department.
Combined, those two departments account for 153 of the county’s 188 authorized teleworkers — more than 81 percent.
Most Departments Do Not Allow Telework
Most Johnston County departments reported no employees authorized for telework.
Those include:
- Administration
- Airport
- Animal Services
- Board of Commissioners
- Board of Elections
- Building Inspections
- Building and Grounds
- Cooperative Extension
- Economic Development
- Emergency 911 Communications
- Environmental Health
- HAPP
- Heritage Center
- Parks and Open Space
- Planning and Zoning
- Public Information Office
- Public Library
- Public Utilities
- Register of Deeds
- Sheriff’s Office
- Soil and Water Conservation
- Solid Waste
- Veterans Service Office
- Visitors Bureau/Tourism
County Says Telework Saves Space, Helps Hiring
Harris said the program should also be viewed in the context of county staffing and office-space limitations.
He said Social Services and Health — which account for the overwhelming majority of teleworkers — are among the departments facing the greatest space constraints.
“Telework has helped us make better use of the space we have and has delayed the need for costly new buildings,” Harris said.
He said the option also helps Johnston County compete for workers.
“It has also become an important recruitment and retention tool, particularly when we are competing with larger counties that can offer employees greater flexibility and, in some cases, higher pay,” Harris said.
Harris also emphasized that authorization does not mean employees spend every workday at home.
“The vast majority of Johnston County employees work in the office every day,” he said. “And being authorized to telework does not mean an employee works from home every day; in many cases, it is a hybrid approach.”
County Policy Recognizes Accountability Risks
Johnston County’s telework policy was adopted Sept. 8, 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The policy makes clear that telework is not an employee entitlement and says the needs of county government and service to the public take priority.
It prohibits personal business during scheduled work hours, says telework cannot substitute for dependent care and requires employees to accurately document and report time worked.
Some departments have adopted even tighter controls.
Child Support Enforcement requires teleworking employees to respond to electronic messages within 10 minutes, maintain work logs and complete assigned worklists. Department rules say those worklists are among the methods supervisors use to verify that work is being performed at home.
Repeated failures can result in telework being suspended or revoked.
The records provided to JoCoReport do not show that every department allowing remote work has comparable written monitoring requirements.
Harris Supports Review
Harris said a policy adopted nearly six years ago deserves another look.
“I think it is entirely reasonable for the Board and administration to review the policy and how it is being used today,” Harris said.
“Reviewing a policy does not mean the policy is failing. It means we should periodically make sure our policies reflect current conditions, provide appropriate accountability and continue to serve the taxpayers and the County’s workforce effectively.”
Harris did not propose specific changes.
Johnston County now says 188 full-time employees are authorized for scheduled telework — a number the county did not have readily compiled until JoCoReport requested it.
At the same time, three department heads whom county employees say sometimes work remotely do not appear on the county’s approved telework list. The county’s records do not explain whether those managers are working under separate arrangements, were omitted from the list, or are teleworking without being formally recorded.
Harris said the County Manager should have a clear understanding of who is authorized to telework and under what circumstances. The records reviewed by JoCoReport show that understanding was not reflected in a complete, centralized accounting before the public records request — and questions remain about whether the county’s newly compiled list is accurate and complete.
Discover more from JoCo Report
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.














Let me guess…the DSS Director is letting all her newly acquired supervisors, (friends) “work from home” like she does…
Telework should be used if an employee is sick and their workload can not afford to get behind. many agencies are abusing teleworking for family trips, or to run personal errands. I knew this because it is being abused on the state level too.
If I am sick, I am using my sick time to get better. Not work from home. The manager can disperse the workload.
@Busted: If they’re not doing their job, then it falls on their supervisor to hold them accountable. If they are doing their job, why does it matter where they’re working from?
no one should be working from home now… No one.
This is what the taxpayers now get from our so called leaders….letting people work from home…they need to get up shower dress drive to work like the rest of us….fire the bums!!!
Exactly, I’m so glad police, fire, ems doctors and nurses don’t work from home. Working from home is unproductive and a joke. They do tend to minutes of work and use the bathroom for an hour…..people who think they should be allowed to work from home are arrogant d bags.
@john: Why? If they’re doing their job and saving taxpayers money, why does it matter?
Exactly
How are they saving taxpayers money? They are literally getting paid with tax payer funds. These are public employees, not private. If you want to work for a private company which allows work from home that’s fine with me. If you want to work for a company which allows it, again, fine with mea. However, they work for the public and should have to go in to a workplace to make sure they are doing their job.
@Jonathan: If they’re working from their own home, they’re paying for the electricity. And internet. And their own toilet paper. Etc.
As long as they’re doing their job, why do you care where they’re doing it from?
You also have county employees that are home every day before 2:00. County vehicle parked in the yard every single day without fail before 2:00. With the county just increasing property taxes the way mine went up it looks like they would have better supervision over employees.
I never understood why they are working from home anyway just making them lazy. in half of the time when you call they won’t answer the phone because they somewhere smoking a cigarette
Why does it matter? If they’re doing their job correctly, I don’t care if they’re at home or in an office. Having public employees work from home saves the taxpayers money on facilities.
It matters because they are public servants.
@Jonathan If they’re serving the public from home, what’s the problem?
Then why do they keep building facilities?
Seeing why my property taxes doubled now. Uncontrolled growth=loss of control. I went thru a season of work from home during Covid. You can spin it however you want but it impacts collaboration, encourages an entitlement mindset, and negatively affects moral of staff that are not given that opportunity.
Too sorry to work, too scared to steal, public servant, BS. Government doesn’t have to turn a profit, just steal a little more. Stand in line and see your tax dollars lounging around.
Well my company is now virtual. I’ve never worked so many hours each week in my 40 year career. 22% of the total US workforce is now virtual or hybrid while 36% works a gig job. I’m sure some people abuse it but to characterize all virtual workers as slackers is very inaccurate. Many employers have been forced to offer hybrid because they can’t find traditional in office workers to fill positions. Virtual opens up their talent pool to virtually anywhere. Others are experimenting with gig workers. As to how it saves tax payers it saves on having to build or expand office buildings for one. My company sold all three of its buildings which represented a tremendous savings. Just wanted to offer a counter perspective since all the comments so far are clearly against alternative work schedules
Well stated Blizz!
If employees are working from home and their salary is based on a competitive market rate, one could argue that they should be paid less. They do not have commuting expenses, may have reduced childcare costs, spend less on work clothing, save money on lunches, and incur fewer transportation costs such as gas and vehicle wear and tear.
I am supportive of remote work, but I believe it could justify a reduced salary compared to employees who are required to come into the office. Why should someone who works from home be paid the same as someone who incurs the additional costs and time commitment of working on-site?
@Lady: This doesn’t make sense. Even without work-from-home, are you suggesting that people who live closer to the office should be paid less? Or people with young children should be paid more?!?!
I’m not against someone working from home if they are disciplined enough to get their work done and is respectful enough to a customer/patient/business partner if one calls that they don’t have to listen to a child crying and screaming in the background with the tv running and when the phone was answered by the employee they didn’t sound like they had just rolled out of bed (this has happened to me several times).
Let’s breakdown what the cost is for someone working from home vs the cost for someone who reports to their job physically, keeping in mind that these employees make the same salary paid once a month and do the exact same job and live the same distance from work:
Reports to work @ office Reports to work @ home
Childcare $1,100 Childcare $0
Gas and wear & tear $300 Gas and wear & tear $0
Appropriate Clothing $250 Appropriate Clothing $0
Total = $1,650 Total = $ 0
Big difference and causes a bad vibe in the office work environment….I have seen the ruined work relationships.
I am supportive of remote work to a degree. I know first hand from being a former county employee that space has always been an issue. Dilapidated buildings has always been an issue, micro-managing has always been an issue. Seasoned employees are treated as if they are back in middle school with the mean girls club and it absolutely is a problem where the loudest ones (who are in the wrong 99% of the time) are given more support than the workers who do their job correctly, and are seasoned workers who the community depends on. Those who bark the loudest and cause the biggest stink are pacified and the good workers are punished and pushed aside and told to just deal. And they are the ones that have finally had enough and are leaving in droves. It is a very sad thing to see has gotten worse.
This explains why I have had a bad experience twice in the last 2 months. The 1st while helping someone apply for benefits. We submitted all required documentation, the worker said that they had 45 days to respond. Checked in around 35 days was once again told 45 days. Had she even looked up the case she would have seen it had been in effect over 30 days, which I did not find out until I called on day 47 to find out it was in place.
Work from home in the public sector should be monitored based on computer and phone activity. You can’t tell me if someone is working at computer 8 hours a day they can’t respond to an email with in 24 hours.
So sorry for the messed up chart in my post…I can’t edit it.
a person who reports to work on the job site is spending $1650 clothing, childcare, gas, and wear and tear on the vehicle whereas someone working from home most likely doesn’t pay any of that.