Smithfield Mayor Casts Deciding Vote Against Peedin Road Rezoning

Johnston County GIS Map highlighting 14 Peedin Road, Smithfield in red. (Courtesy Town of Smithfield)

SMITHFIELD, N.C. — A Clayton couple’s effort to build a home for their family on a vacant lot off North Brightleaf Boulevard in Smithfield was denied after the Town Council split evenly on a rezoning request, leaving Mayor Andy Moore to cast the deciding vote.

On July 21, Maria Dawod asked the council to rezone a 0.497-acre parcel at 14 Peedin Road from B-3 Highway Entranceway Business to R-6 Residential so she and her husband could build a single-family home. The property is located behind the Speedway convenience store off North Brightleaf Boulevard.

Addressing the council, Dawod said the couple wanted to build a home where they could raise their family and children.

Planning Director Brent Reck told council members the property is currently vacant but historically served as residential property. Planning records show two homes once stood on the lot before they were demolished years ago. The applicant’s proposal called for construction of a single-family residence.

Reck also noted the property is somewhat unique because, while it remains commercially zoned, several adjacent parcels along Peedin Road are already zoned R-6 residential and contain single-family homes. Planning staff concluded that, with appropriate site development, the property would be compatible with the nearby residential uses despite the surrounding commercial development.

Both the Smithfield Planning Board and town planning staff recommended approval of the rezoning request.

Despite those recommendations, several council members questioned the type of rezoning being requested.

Rather than seeking conditional zoning, which would have limited the property to a specific use, the application requested standard R-6 zoning. Council members expressed concern that while Dawod intended to build a single-family home, unrestricted R-6 zoning could allow other residential uses permitted under the ordinance, including townhomes, without returning to the council for additional approval.

Council members asked Reck how long it would take for the applicants to reapply under the conditional zoning process. Reck said the process would require another public hearing and Planning Board review and would take at least 60 days, possibly longer.

During questioning, Dawod acknowledged she knew the property was zoned commercial when she purchased it earlier this year.

Council members also expressed concern that Peedin Road has become a heavily traveled commercial corridor with businesses surrounding the property, including the adjacent Speedway convenience store.

Following discussion, the council voted 3-3 on the rezoning request.

Voting in favor were John Dunn, Dr. Gettys Cohen and Sloan Stevens.

Voting against were Travis Scott, Steve Rabil and Doris Wallace.

Mayor Andy Moore broke the tie by voting against the rezoning, saying he believed the property should remain available for future commercial development rather than converting additional commercially zoned land to residential use.

Several council members emphasized they were not opposed to Dawod building a home on the property but were uncomfortable approving unrestricted R-6 zoning. They indicated a conditional rezoning that limited the parcel to a single-family residence would provide greater protection against future higher-density residential development while preserving the council’s ability to control how the property could be used.

The denial does not prevent the applicants from submitting a new request seeking conditional R-6 zoning for the property.


Discover more from JoCo Report

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

12 Comments

  1. What business is it of the government is they want to build a home on their land? “Home of the free” except you need almighty government’s permission to build a home.

  2. That’s so stupid … that parcel is NOT big enough for any kind of commercial business to go there …. no parking for one and road frontage is Peedin Road, so no parking on the street! These people need to stop and be voted out!!

  3. So, in other words Smithfield wants tax dollars from a business instead of tax dollars from a residential home. Guess they have to pay for that stadium so how.

  4. Seems like town council members AND the mayor are against one new home being built on this one lot but not against hundreds of new homes on forest and farm acreage. This is not right! I don’t believe that one lot will ever have a commercial property one it.

  5. That’s completely disgusting, there’s no reason why they can’t build a house and limit it. It used to be residential put it back to residential. What are we communist Smithfield?

  6. Personally I think the council members that voted no, may believe that the owners have other intentions for the property. Hidden Intentions. They bought it knowing it was zoned commercial, that’s what she said….knowing full well that it was no longer R-6, and if she gets rezoned, she could just pop off and resell to Mr.Northern Billionaire Developer…. like Council members said-“without ever having to come back for alternative type R-6 options. (Can you say “AFFORDABLE HOUSING “). BTW NEW ZONING PLANS ARE BEING ANNOUNCED SOON FOR THE COUNTY!! Already announced meeting for Public, etc—STAY ALERT AND ATTEND PLEASE!!

    • Exactly! As I said earlier, who would want to build their home behind a gas station. You hit the nail on the head. Their plans are to sell to a developer or build townhouses and rent them once the zoning is changed.

    • How many townhouses do you think will fit on 1/2 acre? A duplex, maybe? I don’t see the problem at that location. And the council don’t seem to mind them elsewhere. I think something else is going on, and the conditional will be denied as well after wasting more of the land owner’s time and money. Perhaps the good old boys want to get hold of it cheap.

Comments are closed.